Tuesday, July 10, 2007

DOI Associate Secretary encourages Los Coyotes to reconsider on-reservation casino; discourages Barstow scheme



THE ASSOCIATE DEPUTY SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR
WASHINGTON, DC 20240


February 13, 2007
    The Honorable Catherine Saubel
    Chairwoman, Los Coyotes Band
    of Cahuilla & Cupeňo Indians
    P.O. Box 189
    Warner Springs, California 92086

    Dear Chairman Saubel:

    The Los Coyotes Band of Cahuilla & Cupeňo Indians (Tribe) has proposed that the United States take 20 acres in trust for a proposed casino project located in Barstow, San Bernardino County, California. The Tribe, which has approximately 288 members, owns approximately 25,049.63 acres of land in trust near Warner Springs, California over 115 miles from the proposed project.

    Generally, the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA) permits Indian Tribes to establish gaming operations on Indian lands upon which the tribe exercised jurisdiction as of October 17, 1988. Clearly, the Tribe did not exercise jurisdiction on the subject parcel in 1988, therefore it cannot be used for gaming purposes as a matter of law. However, IGRA provides several exceptions in Section 20 of IGRA.

    The application from the Tribe seeks to obtain approval under an exception referred to in Section 20 of IGRA. Section 20 allows tribes to conduct casino gaming off-reservation if certain conditions are met. Please be advised that we share the concerns that many have expressed with off-reservation gaming and so-called “reservation shopping.” During the 109th Congress, legislation was introduced in both the United States Senate and House of Representatives that would have significantly restricted or eliminated the options currently available to Indian tribes under Section 20.

    As a result of the public concerns being reflected in the aforementioned proposed legislation and other concerns advanced by local jurisdictions, the Department will be reviewing the regulations that govern the processing of fee-into-trust applications (25 CFR Part 151). We anticipate changes to the rules that may result in fewer off-reservation properties being accepted into trust. In particular, we expect to consider a paradigm where the likelihood of accepting off-reservation land into trust decreases with the distance the subject parcel is from the Tribe’s established reservation or ancestral lands, and the majority of tribal members.

    Further, we plan to review our approach for soliciting and accommodating the views of elected officials (State, county, city, etc.) and community members in the local area as part of our IGRA Section 20 decisions. We also plan more detailed consideration of the broad implications associated with new gaming operations with established communities where gaming is not currently conducted.

    Finally, we expect continued Congressional efforts during the 110th Congress to restrict or terminate the options currently available under Section 20. Consequently, the Department plans to review its approach to evaluating Section 20 gaming applications to ensure that we are able to justify to concerned Congressional leaders any action the Department may take to approve an off-reservation gaming application.

    Because the Department has not considered the relative merits of your Section 20 application yet, we cannot advise you further about its prospects for approval. We know that pursuing a Section 20 gaming application can be a long challenging, and expensive process. We urge you to become fully aware of the changing environment and to discuss the risks of pursuing an off-reservation gaming application with your tribal council, legal counsel, and business partners. In addition, we urge you to consider fully the relative risks, costs, and benefits of pursuing an alternative on-reservation gaming initiative.

    After your thoughtful review of the changing gaming environment, and if you should decide to commit the resources required to pursue your application further, we will work with the Tribe, representatives of local jurisdictions, the public, and Congress to ensure that we can properly evaluate your application.

    Sincerely,

    James E. Cason




Copy of Original Letter from James E. Cason to Catherine Saubel

No comments:

TVT has welcomed more than 178,000 unique vistors

TVT, founded in December 2006, has averaged more than 20,000 visitors annually. It is produced with the support of scores of individuals from coast-to-coast, each a volunteer citizen activist/jounalist, who review tips and compile the verifiable details and documents that are the hallmark of our content.

Since our first post, more than 178,000 visitors have accessed the details compiled uniquely at TVT.

The citizen activists behind TVT wish to extened a big "THANK YOU" to all those who have provided "tips" -- contributed pictures, documents, link suggestions, leads, reports, insight and comments. Your trust and confidence in TVT has allowed us to create a comprehensive resource that thousands of others -- including bloggers, journalists, Members of Congress and other local citizen activists around the country -- have come to rely upon.

We invite feedback and constructive comment and want you to know you are welcome to do that here in "comments" or by contacting us directly and confidentially via allverifiable@gmail.com

Google News: Indian Gaming

NEWS: Bay Mills Indian Community & Casino Proposals

NEWS: Shinnecock Indian Nation (Gateway Casino Resorts) Casino Proposals

NY Times: Shinnecock Indian Nation

NEWS: Los Coyotes Indian Tribe

NEWS: Los Coyotes / Barwest Barstow Casino Proposals

NEWS: Michael J. Malik, Sr.

NEWS: Marian Ilitch

Muckety.com: Mapping Social Networks

Play with the interactive tool here or visit Muckety.com

TIP: Search for multiple entries in the Muckety.com database simultaneously by separating their names with the word and

certainly must reads!

Ilitch has backed loosing sports teams and pizza, but casinos in Detroit? Forbes.com 10.09.06 ● Marian Ilitch #1 on "25 Most Powerful People" to Watch 2006” global gaming business o1.oo.o5 ● My Kingdom for a Casino Forbes 05.08.06 ● Big Lagoon’s casino dream awakens north coast journal 07.28.05 ● Shinnecocks launch legal claim to Hamptons land newsday.com 06.16.05 ● Ilitch Plans to Expand Casino Empire RGTonline.com 07.05.05 ● Ilitch outbids partners MichiganDaily.com 04.14.05 ● Ilitch enmeshed in NY casino dispute detnews.com 03.20.05 ● Marian Ilitch, high roller freep.com 03.20.05 ● MGM Mirage to Decide on Offer for Casino in Detroit rgtonline.com 04.16.05 ● Secret deal for MotorCity alleged freep.com 02.15.05 ● Los Coyotes get new developer desertdispatch.com 02.08.05 Detroit casino figure to finance Barstow project LasVegasSun.com 07.07.03 ● Indian Band trying to put casino in Barstow signonSanDiego.com 06.04.03 Pizza matriarch takes on casino roles detnews.com 10.23.02 ● Vanderbilt gets short straw in negotiations for a casino Lansing Journal 10.06.02 ● Indians aim to drive family from tribe in vicious dispute san diego union tribune 04.09.00 ●Malik owns 2000 Michigan Quarter Horse of the Year Michigan.gov 01.01.00 ● Detroit Team to run Michigan’s newest Indian casino detnews.com 05.23.99 Tiger ties tangle Marian Ilitch detnews.com 04.29.99 ● Three investors must sell their Detroit casino interests gamblingmagazine.com 04.25.99 ● Partners’ cash revived election; They say money was crucial to Prop-E detnews.com 04.25.99 Investors have troubled histories las vegas review journal 04.27.99 ● Investor served probation for domestic assault on 12 year old boy detnews.com 04.25.99 Can a pair win a jackpot?: local men hope to... crainsdetroit.com 03.17.97

The Verifiable Truth