Time for an updated advisory vote on Port Huron casino schemes?

In a June 26, 2001 advisory vote, City of Port Huron voters said they supported plans for a casino to be developed on the site of the Thomas Edison Inn. Now Michigan's Governor Jennifer Granholm has renegotiated terms of an agreement -- previously negotiated by former Governor John Engler -- with the Bay Mills Indian Community regarding the tribe's proposed Port Huron casino resort. Among other changes, the agreement would give the tribe the option of building a casino on an alternative site in Port Huron. The Bay Mills Indian Community currently has two casinos on its Brimley, Michigan reservation.

Given that the last advisory vote was held nearly seven years ago and that the new plans would allow the Bay Mills Indian Community to develop a casino on an alternative site; wouldn't it be advisable for proponents of the casino to allow voters to weigh in on the modified plans in another advisory vote that could be added to one of Port Huron's upcoming 2008 ballots?

Further, does it might make sense to extend the advisory ballot measure to voters throughout St. Clair County who will be impacted by the proposed casino?